Architecture Competitions | uni.xyz

Browse and enter architecture competitions worldwide. Open architecture competitions, design contests, and ideas competitions with cash prizes, expert jury evaluation, and global recognition for architects and designers.

Please enable JavaScript to use this application.

Join 100+ businesses crowdsourcing their design needs

Typology: Adaptive Re-use 2

Challenges that look at repurposing existing architecture by re-inventing it's functions

Ongoing Competitions

Hosted by UNI

Envent

Design challenge to reuse E-waste

Prize Pool:USD 7,000

Regular registration ends: October 30, 2026

Submission ends: November 1, 2026

Worldwide

Past Competitions

Hosted by UNI

Co-design Milan

Challenge to rebuilt designer’s hub in city of Milan

Prize Pool:USD 150

Results Announced!: June 29, 2023

Milan, Italy

3 Entries received

Adaptive Re-Use Architecture Competitions: Office Conversions, Industrial Transformations, and the Design Future of Existing Buildings (Updated August 2026)

This is the UNI editorial home for adaptive reuse architecture — the practice of transforming existing buildings into new uses rather than demolishing and rebuilding. It is the most important architectural discipline of the 2020s, for a simple reason: the carbon is already there. Every existing building represents decades of embodied carbon, millions of tons of material, and generations of human memory. Tearing it down and starting over throws all of that away. Transforming it — adapting, renovating, repurposing, adding — keeps the investment alive and responds to the climate emergency with the single most powerful tool architecture has: not building new.

This section curates UNI competitions focused on adaptive reuse across every typology: office-to-residential conversions, industrial-to-cultural transformations (Tate Modern, Fiat Lingotto, CaixaForum), church-to-residential conversions, military-to-civilian repurposing, retail extinction and dead mall redevelopment, and the full spectrum of existing-building transformation. For the heritage-focused dimension, see our complementary heritage conservation and adaptive reuse section.

What Adaptive Re-Use Means in Architectural Practice

Adaptive reuse is the practice of changing a building's function while preserving its physical structure. It is distinct from renovation (updating a building for the same use), preservation (protecting a building for historical value), and demolition-and-rebuild. The defining move is re-programming: taking a building designed for one purpose and asking what it could become.

A working typology of adaptive reuse approaches:

Pure re-programming: the structure stays, the function changes. A power station becomes a museum. A church becomes a library. A factory becomes apartments.
Transformation and addition: the existing building is extended, expanded, or wrapped in new construction. Lacaton & Vassal's social housing transformations add new facades, winter gardens, and circulation systems while keeping the original structure.
Partial preservation: keeping the most valuable elements of a building — the facade, the frame, the envelope, the interior atrium — while replacing the rest. Common in heritage contexts.
Reconstruction with continuity: rebuilding damaged buildings in a way that preserves their memory while acknowledging the repair. David Chipperfield's Neues Museum (Berlin) is the canonical example.
Adaptive mining: dismantling a building for its materials and using them to build something new on site or elsewhere. Wang Shu's Pritzker Prize-winning work draws heavily on this approach.

Why Adaptive Re-Use Is the Most Urgent Architectural Discipline of 2026

The construction sector accounts for roughly 40% of global CO2 emissions. Approximately half of that is operational (heating, cooling, lighting), and the other half is embodied carbon — the emissions locked into the materials, manufacturing, and construction of a building itself. Demolishing an existing building and building a new one in its place releases the embodied carbon of the original construction (through waste) and generates new embodied carbon (through fresh construction). Adaptive reuse cuts that loop almost entirely. The greenest building is the one already standing.

Beyond the background climate argument, the foreground events of 2024-2026 have made adaptive reuse urgent on commercial, policy, and housing grounds simultaneously:

The office-to-residential wave. As of Q1 2026, the US has approximately 90,300 office-to-residential conversion units in the pipeline — up roughly 28% year over year. New York City alone is expected to deliver over 16,000 converted units in 2026; Washington DC over 8,000; Chicago over 4,000. Post-pandemic office vacancies (near 20% in many downtowns) and the housing crisis have made conversion economically viable at scale for the first time in decades.
Policy is forcing the industry's hand. New York City's Local Law 97 (LL97) mandates emissions reductions on existing buildings. The European Union's Renovation Wave sets binding targets for upgrading existing building stock. Denver, Los Angeles, and other US cities have launched conversion incentive programs.
Construction costs are rising. Material prices, labour costs, and supply chain disruptions have made new construction expensive. Reusing existing structures is often the cheaper path.
Historic preservation pressure. Cities with significant heritage building stock are increasingly reluctant to approve demolition of pre-1950 construction. Adaptive reuse becomes the compromise position.
Circular economy momentum. Material reuse, urban mining, and the salvage economy are moving from fringe experiments to mainstream practice.

"Never Demolish, Never Remove or Replace — Always Add, Transform, and Reuse"

This is the manifesto line of Lacaton & Vassal, the French architectural practice awarded the Pritzker Prize in 2021. Anne Lacaton and Jean-Philippe Vassal wrote the phrase (with Frédéric Druot) in 2004 in the book PLUS: Les Grands Ensembles de Logements, and they spent the following 20 years building the evidence for it. Their best-known project — the transformation of 530 dwellings in the Grand Parc social housing estate in Bordeaux (with Druot and Christophe Hutin, 2017) — took three existing mid-century concrete tower blocks slated for demolition and instead wrapped them in new winter-garden facades that doubled the livable area of every apartment without displacing residents for more than a few hours per day. The project won the 2019 Mies van der Rohe Award and remains the canonical example of adaptive reuse as social justice.

The Lacaton & Vassal Pritzker win marked the moment when "never demolish" shifted from fringe manifesto to establishment consensus. The architectural profession's most prestigious prize was awarded specifically for not tearing things down.

The Full Typology Map — Every Building Is a Candidate for Reuse

Office-to-Residential Conversions

The defining conversion wave of the 2020s. Post-pandemic office vacancies made commercial buildings in downtown cores economically unviable. Housing crises in the same cities made residential conversions financially attractive. The result: an unprecedented wave of office-to-residential conversion projects, concentrated in New York City, Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, Denver, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and increasingly European cities. The design challenges are real — deep floor plates, central cores, insufficient plumbing stacks, commercial window patterns — but the economics are finally aligned.

Industrial-to-Cultural Conversions

The most architecturally celebrated adaptive reuse category. Tate Modern (Herzog & de Meuron, London 2000, expanded 2016) — a former power station transformed into one of the world's most visited art museums — is the canonical contemporary example. Other references: Fiat Lingotto (Renzo Piano, Turin, former car factory), CaixaForum Madrid (Herzog & de Meuron, former power station), Punta della Dogana (Tadao Ando, Venice, former customs house), Garage Museum Moscow (OMA, former bus depot), Zollverein Essen (former coal mine complex, Germany). Industrial buildings often have the structural capacity, ceiling heights, and open floor plates that make them ideal for conversion to museums, performance venues, maker spaces, and mixed-use cultural destinations.

Church and Religious Building Conversions

As religious attendance has declined across Europe and parts of North America, former churches, chapels, and monasteries have become available for conversion. Subtypes include church-to-residential (apartments, single-family homes, condos), church-to-cultural (community centres, bookshops, libraries, music venues), and church-to-hospitality (boutique hotels in former monasteries). The design challenge is the disproportion between nave and program — churches were built for vast shared worship, which maps awkwardly onto residential scale.

Military-to-Civilian Repurposing

Decommissioned military installations are among the largest reuse opportunities worldwide. Former barracks become housing, bunkers become art galleries or wine cellars, bases become university campuses or cultural districts. Berlin's Tempelhof Airport (not strictly military but a comparable scale of infrastructure) is a notable European example.

Retail Extinction and Dead Mall Redevelopment

The collapse of mid-tier American retail has left thousands of abandoned shopping malls and department stores. Some are being demolished; others are being converted to housing, medical offices, film studios, schools, and mixed-use developments. The dead mall redevelopment genre is one of the most actively discussed in US architectural and urban planning circles as of 2026.

Grain Silos, Water Towers, and Unlikely Conversions

Some of the most architecturally celebrated adaptive reuse projects involve the most unlikely source buildings. Zeitz MOCAA (Heatherwick Studio, Cape Town 2017) converted a disused grain silo into one of Africa's largest contemporary art museums. Silodam (MVRDV, Amsterdam 2003) converted a grain silo into mixed-use housing. Water towers across Europe and North America have been converted to single-family homes, boutique hotels, and artist studios. Prisons have become hotels (Liberty Hotel, Boston). Hospitals have become housing. Train stations have become markets.

Infrastructure Transformations

The High Line (James Corner Field Operations + Diller Scofidio + Renfro, NYC 2009-2014) transformed an abandoned elevated rail line into one of the most famous urban parks in the world, launching a global wave of elevated park and linear infrastructure conversions.

The Office-to-Residential Boom: Architecture's Biggest Current Challenge

The most commercially and socially consequential adaptive reuse conversation in 2026 is the office-to-residential wave. The numbers:

~90,300 units in the US conversion pipeline as of Q1 2026 — up 28% year over year.
NYC: ~16,358 units in the 2026 pipeline, more than double the prior year.
Washington DC: ~8,479 units in pipeline.
Chicago: ~4,360 units.
Office vacancy in US downtowns: approximately 19-20%, with some central business districts (Downtown LA, San Francisco) higher than 30%.

Why office buildings don't convert easily — the design problem:

Floor plate depth. Commercial office buildings are typically 60-90 feet deep (window-to-window), which leaves a deep windowless core. Residential units need natural light for every habitable room.
Central core design. Office buildings centralize elevators, stairs, bathrooms, and utilities into a single central core. Residential conversions need to re-plumb and re-wire to serve distributed units.
Plumbing stack distribution. Commercial buildings have few plumbing risers. Residential buildings need a kitchen and bathroom per unit.
Window patterns. Many commercial buildings have fixed curtain walls that cannot be opened. Residential units need operable windows.
HVAC reconfiguration. Commercial HVAC is zoned for open plan cooling. Residential HVAC needs zoned heating and cooling per unit.
Code and accessibility. Changing occupancy from commercial to residential triggers new code requirements.

Despite these challenges, conversion is now often cheaper and faster than new construction. Architects who can solve these problems well have more work than they can handle.

The Historic Adaptive Reuse Tradition: Pioneer Projects Every Practitioner Should Know

Carlo Scarpa — Castelvecchio Museum (Verona, 1959-1973): the canonical modern adaptive reuse project. Scarpa inserted modern interventions (steel, concrete, glass, bronze) into a medieval castle turned museum, carefully distinguishing new from old while respecting both.
Herzog & de Meuron — Tate Modern (London, 2000, expanded 2016): the transformation of Giles Gilbert Scott's Bankside Power Station into one of the most visited art museums in the world. Celebrates 25 years in 2025-2026.
David Chipperfield — Neues Museum (Berlin, 2009): the reconstruction of Friedrich August Stüler's war-damaged museum using a methodology that preserved every surviving original element while clearly marking new repairs.
Tadao Ando — Punta della Dogana (Venice, 2009): a former customs house converted into a contemporary art museum. Minimalist insertions in a 17th-century shell.
Renzo Piano — Fiat Lingotto (Turin, ongoing from 1985): the transformation of the famous Fiat car factory into a multi-use cultural, commercial, and educational complex.
Lacaton & Vassal + Druot + Hutin — Grand Parc Bordeaux Transformation (2017): 530 social housing dwellings transformed with new winter-garden facades rather than demolition. Won the 2019 Mies van der Rohe Award.
Rem Koolhaas / OMA — Garage Museum (Moscow, 2015): a former Soviet bus depot converted into a contemporary art museum with a polycarbonate skin that preserves and reveals the original concrete structure.
Heatherwick Studio — Zeitz MOCAA (Cape Town, 2017): a historic grain silo complex carved out to create the Museum of Contemporary Art Africa.
Wang Shu / Amateur Architecture Studio (Pritzker 2012): the Chinese architect whose practice centres on building with materials salvaged from demolition sites.
James Corner Field Operations + Diller Scofidio + Renfro — High Line (NYC, 2009-2014): the transformation of an abandoned elevated rail line into a public park.
MVRDV — Silodam (Amsterdam, 2003) and Pyramid of Tirana (2023): two radically different adaptive reuse projects — one converting a grain silo to mixed-use housing, the other transforming a former communist monument into a cultural centre.

The Circular Construction Frontier: Material Reuse and Urban Mining

Deconstruction vs demolition: deconstruction treats an old building as a material bank rather than waste. Beams, bricks, windows, doors, steel frames, and fixtures are carefully removed, catalogued, and made available for reuse in other projects.
Urban mining: the systematic extraction of construction materials from the existing urban building stock. Recognizing that cities contain enormous quantities of steel, concrete, aluminum, wood, and glass that could be reused rather than extracted fresh from nature.
Material passports: digital records of every component in a building — what it is, where it came from, its material properties, and its potential for reuse. Increasingly standard in European construction.
Salvage economy: the network of architectural salvage yards, material exchanges, and reuse retailers that make material reuse economically viable.
Carbon passports for buildings: regulatory frameworks (emerging in the EU and increasingly mandated in Nordic countries) that track the whole-life carbon of a building and reward reuse and low-carbon materials.

Open Adaptive Reuse Briefs on UNI Right Now

The competitions currently curated in the adaptive re-use section:

Envent — Design challenge to reuse E-waste

For more adaptive reuse briefs across the platform, browse all ongoing competitions.

Technical Challenges of Adaptive Reuse Design

Adaptive reuse is harder than it looks. The challenges that separate amateur from experienced reuse architects:

Structural capacity analysis. The existing structure was designed for a specific load. Changing the program changes the load.
Hidden conditions. Every adaptive reuse project involves opening walls and discovering things that were not on the drawings. Water damage, asbestos, lead paint, concealed structural failures.
Code compliance. Changing occupancy triggers code reviews — fire separation, egress, accessibility, seismic, ventilation.
HVAC and mechanical systems. Old buildings have old systems. Routing new ductwork, plumbing, and electrical through existing structure is one of the most expensive and design-constraining parts of reuse.
Daylight and windows. Commercial buildings have curtain walls; industrial buildings have clerestories; religious buildings have stained glass. Resolving this without destroying the historic character is one of the hardest reuse problems.
Acoustic isolation. Open-plan office buildings and industrial structures have no sound isolation between floors or units. Residential conversions need substantial acoustic upgrades.
Seismic upgrades. Older buildings were designed to earlier seismic standards.
Historic preservation compliance. Buildings on heritage registers carry legal protections. Interventions must be approved, documented, and often reversible.

How to Prepare a Strong Adaptive Reuse Competition Entry

Take the existing building seriously. Study it as carefully as you would study a site. Understand its history, its structure, its hidden logics.
Declare your approach explicitly. Pure re-programming? Transformation with addition? Partial preservation? Reconstruction with continuity? Adaptive mining? Each approach carries different design strategies.
Quantify the carbon argument. Embodied carbon savings are the moral core of contemporary adaptive reuse. Calculate or estimate the embodied carbon preserved by not demolishing.
Cite your precedents honestly. Lacaton & Vassal, Chipperfield, Scarpa, Herzog & de Meuron, Wang Shu, Heatherwick, MVRDV.
Show before and after clearly. Adaptive reuse entries live or die on the visibility of the transformation.
Address the technical challenges head-on. Don't hide the structural analysis, the HVAC routing, the code compliance strategy, the hidden conditions.
Preserve what deserves preservation. Not every element of an existing building is worth keeping.
Design the social transition. If the building has existing users, their displacement is part of the design problem. The Lacaton & Vassal Bordeaux project's genius was keeping residents in place throughout construction.
Don't pretend the intervention is invisible. The best adaptive reuse makes new additions legible as new.

August 2026 Platform Snapshot

1 open briefs currently curated in the adaptive re-use section
46 competitions currently open across all themes on the platform
768 total competitions hosted on UNI since 2017
7964 total entries submitted across all competitions
904 jurors have evaluated work on the platform
270K+ architects and designers in the global UNI community
78 disciplines across architecture, heritage conservation, sustainability, and allied fields

Frequently Asked Questions About Adaptive Reuse Architecture

What is adaptive reuse in architecture?

Adaptive reuse is the practice of transforming an existing building to serve a new function while preserving its physical structure. It is distinct from renovation (updating a building for the same use), preservation (protecting a building for historical value), and demolition-and-rebuild. Examples include converting a factory into apartments, a church into a cultural centre, or an office tower into residential units.

What is the difference between adaptive reuse and historic preservation?

Historic preservation focuses on protecting a building's physical and cultural heritage — the goal is to keep the building as close to its historic form as possible. Adaptive reuse focuses on giving a building a new functional life — the goal is to keep the structure in productive use, even if that means significant changes to the interior, circulation, or program. The two often overlap in practice.

Is adaptive reuse cheaper than new construction?

Often, yes — especially in dense urban cores where land costs are high and new construction is slow. Office-to-residential conversions in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Chicago are currently being delivered at lower cost per unit than comparable new construction. However, adaptive reuse can be more expensive when the existing building has significant hidden conditions (contamination, structural failures) or when heritage protections impose expensive compliance requirements.

What types of buildings convert most successfully?

Industrial buildings (factories, warehouses, power stations, grain silos) are often the most successful because they have robust structures, generous ceiling heights, and open floor plates. Offices are viable but challenging due to deep floor plates, central cores, and limited plumbing. Churches can convert well but face disproportion challenges. The best candidates are buildings with strong structural bones, good natural light access, and flexible floor plans.

What is the embodied carbon argument for adaptive reuse?

Every existing building represents decades of embodied carbon — the emissions from manufacturing the steel, concrete, brick, glass, and wood it contains, plus the emissions from construction itself. Demolishing that building and building a new one in its place throws away the embodied carbon investment and generates fresh emissions. Adaptive reuse keeps the original embodied carbon "invested" and requires only the emissions of the transformation itself. For most buildings, reuse saves 50-75% of total whole-life carbon compared to demolition and rebuild. This is the single most powerful climate argument architects have.

Who are the leading adaptive reuse architects working today?

Lacaton & Vassal (Pritzker 2021, "never demolish" manifesto), David Chipperfield (Neues Museum), Herzog & de Meuron (Tate Modern, CaixaForum), Tadao Ando (Punta della Dogana), Wang Shu / Amateur Architecture Studio (Pritzker 2012, urban mining practice), Heatherwick Studio (Zeitz MOCAA), MVRDV (Silodam, Pyramid of Tirana), OMA (Garage Moscow), and Renzo Piano (Fiat Lingotto).

What is the "never demolish" manifesto?

"Never demolish, never remove or replace — always add, transform, and reuse" is the phrase coined by Anne Lacaton, Jean-Philippe Vassal, and Frédéric Druot in 2004. It became the philosophical foundation of Lacaton & Vassal's entire practice and the basis of their 2021 Pritzker Prize citation. The manifesto argues that architects should treat demolition as a last resort rather than a default, and that most existing buildings can be transformed rather than replaced.

What is the office-to-residential conversion wave?

Since the COVID-19 pandemic reduced demand for downtown office space, many US and European cities have experienced 15-30% office vacancy rates. Combined with severe housing shortages in the same cities, this has created economic conditions favourable to converting empty office buildings into residential apartments. As of Q1 2026, the US has approximately 90,300 office-to-residential conversion units in the pipeline — a fourfold increase from 2022. New York City, Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Denver are leading the wave.

Can architecture students enter adaptive reuse competitions?

Yes. Adaptive reuse is a particularly accessible competition category for students because it requires careful site research, typological thinking, and creative reuse of existing forms. Many UNI competitions in this section welcome student entries, and a UNI Membership unlocks unlimited access to every brief on the platform.

How does UNI curate adaptive reuse competitions?

UNI editors select briefs where transformation of an existing building is central to the design problem. We welcome office-to-residential conversions, industrial-to-cultural transformations, church and religious building conversions, infrastructure reuse, historic building adaptation, and circular construction projects. See our sister sections heritage conservation and adaptive reuse for heritage-focused briefs and residential and housing innovations for the housing dimension.

Explore More on UNI

Beyond adaptive reuse, browse all ongoing competitions, see what's trending, preview upcoming launches, or study the past competitions archive. Related sections include heritage conservation and adaptive reuse (heritage-focused briefs), residential and housing innovations (office-to-housing dimension), disaster resilience and climate adaptation (the climate argument), and free architecture competitions. Want unlimited access to every brief on UNI? Explore UNI Membership.