Extending Co-Living
Coliving is reshaping contemporary dwelling using minimum space and resources. The proposal arranges the typical Pod unit into an extended family house layout and offers a full living cycle for asylum seekers within the immigrant respite centre. the design offers flexible functional space layouts with shared amenities that serve various possible users.
Project Media
Image available to members
Poster 01
Site and zoning
Image available to members
Poster 02
Unit configuration
Image available to members
Poster 03
Public space
Image available to members
Poster 04
Life cycle of asylum seekers
Explore Urban Design Competitions
Discover active competitions in this discipline
Hosted by UNI
The Global Benchmark for Architecture Dissertation Awards
Prize Pool:USD 1,000
Registration ends: June 30, 2026
Submission ends: July 1, 2026
Worldwide
Hosted by UNI
Deconstructivism - Illustration Design Challenge
Prize Pool:USD 7,000
Regular registration: September 30, 2026
Submission ends: October 1, 2026
Worldwide
Hosted by UNI
Design challenge to reuse E-waste
Prize Pool:USD 7,000
Regular registration: 15 days left
Submission ends: May 1, 2026
Worldwide
Similar Projects
Discover related projects you might like
Comments (9)
Please login or sign up to add comments
IT SEEMS TO BE A PROPOSAL DESIGNED FOR A MUCH MORE PERMANENT ACCOMMODATION. LOVE THE VOLUMETRIC COMPOSITION. A PARARELL BRIDGE SEEMS NOT TO BE THE BEST SOLUCTION FOR A BETTER QUIALITY OF LIFE FOR THE MIGRANTS
Despite having merit in the visual presentation, a greater connection with the reality of the challenge presented by the contest would be recommended based on the characteristics of the refugee situation.
General Comments The competition poses a highly complex and difficult question. The restriction to use the bridge as project site narrows down the solutions to - in the best case- intelligent and technical design solutions. Because of that, many of the projects don’t reflect on the question of migration politics, social challenges, and the real problems beyond the architectural solution. To evaluate the projects, my priority was to look for a basic reflection on the migration situation and the related design challenge and a basic idea of the project related to this reflection. The further development of the project has to be coherent to this idea and the design outcome has to reflect somehow the values of the idea. The criteria of proper representation helps to understand the idea and the development. Not the best looking image is the winner, but the most coherent graphic language and argumentation line. The compliance of the room program, I don’t consider relevant in this stage of design, so all the projects have the same evaluation.
💪💪✨
🍀
Amazing work 👍👍👍
👍✌️
Have fun! :) :)