Resile: A Clay Village Where Independence Does Not Mean Isolation

Most architecture for people recovering from crisis starts with shelter and stops there. Resile starts with a harder question: what does it take for someone to rebuild a life, not just a roof? The proposal's answer is a settlement where a private room sits within reach of shared kitchens, courtyards, gardens, schools, workplaces and clinics. Its central argument is quietly radical: independence does not have to mean isolation. A resident can retreat when she needs to and take part when she is ready, and the architecture makes both easy.

Designed by Anna Scherer and shortlisted in the Resile competition, the project responds to the lives of women and families affected by prolonged conflict. Scherer does not treat housing as a standalone problem. She builds an interconnected settlement of 20 buildings in which residences, education, healthcare, workspaces, agriculture, worship, childcare, social space and local commerce work as one ecosystem, organized into distinct residential quarters that each keep their own identity while staying tied to the whole.

Footbridges Stitch Separate Blocks Into One Community

The elevations and cross section show the settlement's structure. Compact blocks with striped facades are linked by footbridges, so each building is complete on its own but none is cut off. The small figures on the drawings give the scale: these are modest volumes, sized for households and small groups. The south and north views show changing roof levels and stepped forms, which break up what could have read as a single monolithic complex.

The bridges carry the project's social idea into the structure itself. They let residents move between parts of the settlement above the ground plane, which keeps the courtyards below free for play and gathering. Connection is not left to chance or to a central corridor. It is built into the section, so moving between neighbours becomes part of daily routine.

Courtyards as Social Infrastructure

The plan sheet for the hospital blocks shows how deeply the courtyard drives the scheme. Tree canopies fill the centres of the clusters, and the healthcare spaces wrap around them instead of turning inward along sealed corridors. Next to the drawings, cardboard models test the massing, and a sketch of a shaded passage suggests the comfort of moving through the complex out of the sun. Open space here is not what remains between buildings. It is the main architectural element, and the buildings are arranged to serve it.

This matters most for the people the project is designed for. Children can play in protected open areas, residents can meet informally, and several generations can share community life without a scheduled event. Placing a clinic around a planted courtyard turns care into something embedded in the neighbourhood rather than set apart from it.

A Village Scale That Refuses the Institutional

The rendered view from a shaded terrace sums up the project's mood. Beyond a planted parapet, low striped blocks and small pavilions spread across the site, with silhouetted figures and birds overhead. Nothing dominates. The fragmented massing, along with terraces, passages, stairs and stepped roofs, makes the complex read as an evolving village rather than a facility built to manage people.

Given the serious circumstances behind the brief, this avoidance of the institutional is a deliberate ethical choice. Scherer presents the architecture as a backdrop to everyday life, not an object to admire from a distance. Resilience in this reading comes from places where relationships can form over time, not from construction systems alone.

Learning Among Trees, Building in Clay

The school sheet applies the same logic to education. Classrooms gather around tree-filled courtyards, a colour-coded key organizes the programme, massing models test the volumes, and an interior sketch shows children in a space that feels domestic rather than regimented. Placing learning beside housing, healthcare and work lets parents, especially mothers rebuilding livelihoods, keep their children close while pursuing their own independence.

Clay is the main material across the settlement. Scherer chose it because it is locally available, comparatively easy to process, considered healthy for interior environments, and consistent with the proposal's ecological aims. That choice links the project's sustainability to its social goals: a material that can be sourced and worked locally suggests a place its community could help build, maintain and eventually own.

Why This Project Matters

Resile changes what sustainable architecture is expected to sustain. Low-impact materials and passive shading are part of it, but the deeper ambition is to sustain people: their dignity, their ability to work and learn, and their connection to others after experiences that tend to isolate. By spreading 20 buildings across courtyards and bridges instead of concentrating them into one block, Scherer gives that ambition a clear spatial form.

The project's most transferable lesson is its balance of retreat and participation. Humanitarian and transitional housing often drifts toward either institutional control or scattered isolation. Resile proposes a third option, a village where privacy is protected and community is always one courtyard away. For designers working on post-conflict settlements, that balance is worth studying closely.

View the Full Project

About the Designers

Designer: Anna Scherer

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

uni.xyz runs architecture and design competitions year-round that reward proposals with spatial conviction and real site intelligence.

Project credits: Resile by Anna Scherer Resile (uni.xyz).