Creative Board: A Modular Kit That Turns Refugee Settlements into PlaygroundsCreative Board: A Modular Kit That Turns Refugee Settlements into Playgrounds

Creative Board: A Modular Kit That Turns Refugee Settlements into Playgrounds

UNI logo
UNI Editorial
UNI Editorial published Results under Youth Architecture, Modular Building on

What if a slide could become a bench, then a classroom wall, then part of a communal gathering space, all without discarding a single piece? Creative Board answers that question with a system of standardized architectural modules designed for temporary settlement conditions, where permanence is a luxury and adaptability is survival. The project treats architecture not as a finished object but as an evolving kit: a limited family of components that can be cut, connected, separated and recombined as circumstances shift. Its target users are children in refugee communities, and its ambition is to make play, education and social participation possible through the same set of physical parts.

Designed by Mengyang WU, Creative Board was shortlisted in Re-imagining Play 2020, a competition exploring new possibilities for environments where children can play, learn and develop. The entry stands out for refusing to design a playground in any conventional sense. Instead, it proposes a grammar of modular architecture that allows communities to author their own spatial configurations, producing everything from seesaws to semi-enclosed rooms using the same structural vocabulary.

From Single Frame to Spatial Complexity

Diagram illustrating the evolution of unit modularity through combinable building elements and configurations
Diagram illustrating the evolution of unit modularity through combinable building elements and configurations

The diagram above traces what the project calls the evolution of unit modularity. Individual frames, platforms and supports begin as isolated geometric elements. Through operations of cutting, folding, rotating and connecting, these elements progressively acquire spatial function. The sequence moves from abstract planar components to recognizable play structures: slides, seesaws, swings, a periscope-like observation piece, and a net-rope structure for balance and movement. Each step in the diagram is deliberate; it shows that complexity is not introduced by adding new parts but by reconfiguring existing ones.

The architectural significance here is that playground equipment stops being a catalogue of discrete objects and becomes part of a broader combinatorial system. A swing is not just a swing. It is a specific arrangement of the same module that, reassembled, could become seating or an enclosure wall. The diagram communicates this principle clearly: every configuration shares a common DNA, which means the entire system can be learned, reproduced and modified without specialized construction knowledge.

Enclosures That Children Can Inhabit and Reshape

Axonometric drawing of playground modules within mesh-fenced enclosures populated with figures and trees
Axonometric drawing of playground modules within mesh-fenced enclosures populated with figures and trees
Cutaway axonometric view showing play equipment and figures inside an enclosed modular frame structure
Cutaway axonometric view showing play equipment and figures inside an enclosed modular frame structure

The axonometric drawings reveal how the modular system operates at the scale of an actual inhabited environment. Mesh-fenced enclosures define soft boundaries, and within them, modules are arranged to create distinct zones of activity. Figures populate the scenes, climbing, sitting, observing, playing, giving the drawings a sense of lived occupation rather than abstract diagramming. Trees punctuate the compositions, suggesting that the system is designed to coexist with existing site conditions rather than overwrite them.

The cutaway view is particularly revealing. It peels back the enclosure frame to expose the interior spatial logic: play equipment occupies certain bays while open ground remains available for less structured activity. The frame itself acts as both structural skeleton and spatial organizer, dividing the interior without closing it off. This is architecture that invites participation. Because the modules are sized for handling and reassembly, children and community members become active agents in defining what each enclosure contains and how it behaves over time.

Standardization as a Tool for Variation

Isometric diagram displaying modular spatial units arranged in a vertical assembly with connecting pathways
Isometric diagram displaying modular spatial units arranged in a vertical assembly with connecting pathways

Creative Board's study of what it calls Modular System I investigates repetition and combination at a larger scale. The module size is kept fixed, which simplifies reproduction, but the number of possible arrangements grows rapidly as more units are introduced. The isometric diagram displays modular spatial units stacked in a vertical assembly with connecting pathways, demonstrating that the system is not limited to ground-level configurations. It can grow upward, creating multi-level environments from the same kit of parts.

The key insight is that standardization does not produce uniformity. A small number of components generates benches, enclosures, activity stations, semi-defined rooms and larger collective environments depending on quantity and arrangement. The project accommodates scales ranging from individual reading and conversation to group learning and large social gatherings. By keeping the component family deliberately small, Creative Board ensures that the system remains accessible to communities without specialized tools or training, while still offering genuine spatial diversity.

Why This Project Matters

Most playground design begins and ends with a fixed programme: here is the slide, here is the climbing frame, here is the bench for the parent. Creative Board rejects that premise entirely. It proposes that the relationship between component and function should remain open, governed by a system of transformation rather than a single predetermined layout. For refugee communities, where needs shift rapidly and resources are constrained, this is not a stylistic preference but a practical necessity. The architecture earns its value precisely because it refuses to be finished.

Mengyang WU's contribution to Re-imagining Play 2020 also raises a broader question about who gets to design. When architecture is reduced to a kit that communities can assemble, modify and reassemble, the designer's role shifts from author to enabler. The real design happens on the ground, in the hands of the people who use it. That transfer of agency, from professional to participant, is where Creative Board's most compelling argument lives.



View the Full Project

About the Designers

Designer: Mengyang WU

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

uni.xyz runs architecture and design competitions year-round that reward proposals with spatial conviction and real site intelligence.

Project credits: Creative Board by Mengyang WU Re-imagining Play 2020 (uni.xyz).

UNI logo
UNI Editorial

UNI Editorial

Where architecture meets innovation, through curated news, insights, and reviews from around the globe.

Share your ideas with the world

Share your ideas with the world

Write about your design process, research, or opinions. Your voice matters in the architecture community.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Similar Reads

You might also enjoy these articles

publishedResults1 week ago
Healing Façade: A Modular Chapel System That Restores Ethiopia's Sacred Forests
publishedResults1 week ago
Kaffeebühnen: Where Coffee Shop Architecture Becomes a Civic Stage in Vienna
publishedResults1 week ago
Eco Chapel: A Modular Forest Pavilion That Grows Like the Landscape It Protects
publishedResults5 months ago
Urban Forest: A Vertical Ecosystem for 5,000 Workers in Singapore's Changi Business Park

Explore Youth Architecture Competitions

Discover active competitions in this discipline