Franz and Sue Cluster Three Schools Around Courtyards on a Single Campus in Austria

Schools rarely get to be three things at once. The Oberwart Education Campus, designed by Franz and Sue, stacks a primary school, a music school, and a community events hall into a single 4,725 square meter complex in the Burgenland town of Oberwart, Austria. The building is organized around courtyards that give each program its own identity while threading them together through generous shared circulation. It is an exercise in making overlap productive rather than chaotic.

What makes this project genuinely interesting is the way it negotiates scale. Educational buildings at this density risk becoming institutional corridors connecting institutional rooms. Franz and Sue dissolve that pattern by using house-shaped plywood pavilions, oversized timber stairs, and reading nooks tucked under landings to break the internal volume into child-scaled episodes. The courtyards do the same thing externally, pulling light and landscape deep into the plan. The result is a campus that feels like a small village rather than a single building.

Courtyards and Campus Organization

The massing reads as a series of rendered wings, three storeys at most, that wrap around planted courtyards. From the entrance plaza, paved paths and planted beds distribute visitors across the different programs. Young trees and grass lawns soften the interior courtyards, ensuring that even rooms at the center of the plan receive daylight and a visual connection to landscape. The palette is restrained: light render, timber window frames, and paving that keeps the ground plane legible.

This courtyard typology is not novel, but its execution here is disciplined. Each court is sized differently, responding to its adjacent program. The primary school court is intimate, almost domestic; the larger forecourt near the gymnasium is civic and open. That calibration matters in a building where the users range from six-year-olds to adult musicians rehearsing in the evening.

House-Shaped Pavilions as Interior Landscape

The most recognizable interior move is a set of house-shaped plywood volumes that sit inside the double-height halls. These are not decorative: they house small group rooms, reading corners, and informal teaching spaces, all wrapped in a gabled profile that children immediately understand as "house." The archetype is deliberate. In a building that consolidates three institutions, giving kids a recognizable form to orient around is a spatial anchor.

The plywood structures also modulate acoustics and sightlines. Standing on the main timber floor, you look past the pitched rooflines into adjacent activity zones. A glass-enclosed pavilion in the central hall lets teachers observe multiple groups without fragmenting the open plan. It is a practical solution dressed in a legible geometry, and it works because the architects resist over-decorating it. The birch plywood does the talking.

The Timber Staircase as Social Infrastructure

Wide timber stairs dominate the primary circulation zones, and the architects clearly designed them as much for sitting as for moving. Children perch on the treads, lean into triangular reading nooks tucked beneath the landings, and gather in informal clusters along the risers. The stair becomes an amphitheater, a library annex, and a meeting point all at once.

The yellow triangular niches under the staircase deserve attention. They are playful without being patronizing, scaled to a child's body, and integrated into the stair structure itself rather than applied as afterthought furniture. This kind of spatial generosity in the leftover volume beneath a flight of stairs signals an architect who has genuinely thought about how children occupy a building, not just how they move through it.

Dining and Communal Spaces

The dining hall doubles as a social heart. Acoustic ceiling panels manage the noise of a room full of children, while suspended red linear lighting provides a warm, horizontal datum that draws the eye across the space. A red accent wall in the adjacent dining zone picks up this color thread. It is one of the few moments where the architects introduce saturated color, and the restraint makes it effective.

Timber-framed windows line the dining spaces, maintaining the visual continuity with the courtyard landscape. The ceiling treatment is pragmatic: modular acoustic tiles that can be replaced without disrupting the room's appearance. When the evening program takes over, converting this space for music school events or community gatherings, the acoustic control already built into the architecture makes the transition seamless.

Classrooms and Corridors

The classrooms are calm, well-lit, and deliberately unadorned. Large timber-framed windows face the courtyard trees, and in autumn the foliage fills the room with warm, filtered light. White desks and neutral wall surfaces let the view do the atmospheric work. The corridors, similarly, are treated as inhabited space rather than residual connectors: coat hooks, glazed partitions into adjacent classrooms, and low sills invite pausing and looking.

Glazed partitions between corridors and classrooms serve a dual purpose. They allow passive supervision and they dissolve the sense of enclosure that traditional school hallways impose. A child walking to the bathroom can glance into a music lesson happening next door. This visual porosity encourages the cross-pollination that the campus model promises.

Plans and Drawings

The floor plans reveal the logic that holds the campus together. Wings cluster around courtyards in an almost pinwheel arrangement, with a large rectangular gymnasium volume anchoring one edge. The central circulation core acts as a hinge, distributing movement to the three programmatic zones. Tree circles in the courtyards are drawn with the same precision as the structural grid, suggesting that landscape is treated as integral to the architecture, not as decoration applied after the fact.

What the plans make clear is that this is not a compact building. The architects have traded floor-plate efficiency for spatial richness, allowing courtyards to consume plan area in exchange for daylight, ventilation, and orientation. For a public educational project, that trade-off represents a real commitment from the client and the municipality. The drawings also show a clear separation between the primary school clusters and the music school rooms, confirming that the shared-campus concept works through adjacency rather than overlap.

Why This Project Matters

The Oberwart Education Campus is not trying to reinvent school architecture. Its courtyard organization, its timber materiality, and its house-shaped pavilions all draw on well-tested ideas. What sets it apart is the conviction with which Franz and Sue deploy those ideas together, and the care with which they calibrate every space to its specific users: small children in the morning, teenage musicians in the afternoon, community groups in the evening. The building accommodates all three without defaulting to generic flexibility.

In a moment when many European municipalities are consolidating educational programs into single sites to save money and land, this project offers a useful model. It demonstrates that consolidation does not have to mean compression. By investing plan area in courtyards and generous circulation, the architects create a campus that feels expansive and specific rather than efficient and bland. That is a lesson worth studying, especially for the many school projects currently on drawing boards across the continent.

Oberwart Education Campus, Oberwart, Austria. Architects: Franz and Sue. Area: 4,725 m². Year: 2025. Photography: Hertha Hurnaus.

About the Studio

Share Your Own Work on uni.xyz

If projects like this are the kind of work you want to make, uni.xyz is a place to publish your own, find collaborators, and enter design competitions.