Stadium Cultural Center Park: A Building That Plans Its Own AfterlifeStadium Cultural Center Park: A Building That Plans Its Own Afterlife

Stadium Cultural Center Park: A Building That Plans Its Own Afterlife

UNI
UNI published Story under Sports Architecture, Architecture on

What happens when a stadium is designed not to last, but to transform? Most mega-event venues become expensive relics within a decade, but this project flips that script entirely. "Stadium - Cultural Center - Park" proposes a spatial infrastructure that evolves through three distinct phases: first as a FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 venue, then as a cultural center, and finally as an urban park where concrete slabs remain as historical markers within a green landscape. The building carries its future inside its present form.

Designed by Dinah Brütsch and Simone Durrer, the project was selected as an Editor's Choice Entry in Staydium 2020, a competition that challenged designers to rethink the relationship between stadiums and the cities that host them. Rather than proposing a monument to a single event, Brütsch and Durrer deliver a temporal architecture: a structure whose primary design ambition is its own graceful dissolution into civic life.

A Courtyard That Remembers the Stadium

White rendered courtyard with exterior staircase, green interior steps, and planted trees under clear sky
White rendered courtyard with exterior staircase, green interior steps, and planted trees under clear sky
White facade with yellow accents flanking exterior staircase, framing view through opening to green interior and trees
White facade with yellow accents flanking exterior staircase, framing view through opening to green interior and trees

The rendered views reveal an architecture that already feels post-event: white volumes frame an open courtyard where exterior staircases and green planted steps create a terrain of accessible public space. Trees punctuate the interior, softening the concrete structure and hinting at the park phase yet to come. Yellow accents on the facade add identity without heaviness, marking circulation routes and entry points. The staircase, visible through a framed opening in the second image, doubles as both spectator access during the stadium phase and a connective spine for the cultural center that follows.

What stands out here is the porosity of the design. There are no fortress walls, no turnstile-only thresholds. The courtyard is legible as public space from the start, which makes the eventual transition away from stadium use feel less like demolition and more like subtraction of temporary layers to reveal the permanent civic space beneath.

Mirrored Plan, Embedded Flexibility

Site plan drawing showing mirrored buildings with yellow tower elements and central plaza
Site plan drawing showing mirrored buildings with yellow tower elements and central plaza
Site plan drawing with section showing stadium seating, yellow towers, and symmetrical building layout
Site plan drawing with section showing stadium seating, yellow towers, and symmetrical building layout

The site plan drawings expose the organizational logic: mirrored building volumes flanking a central plaza, with yellow tower elements anchoring the composition. A section cut through the site shows stadium seating nested within this symmetrical layout, confirming that the spectator infrastructure is an insertion rather than the primary structure. The towers and the flanking volumes are the bones; the seating bowl is the temporary organ.

This distinction matters enormously. By treating the stadium function as an overlay on a more durable urban framework, the designers avoid the trap of retrofitting a single-purpose building. The symmetry of the plan also generates clear orientations and sightlines, qualities that serve equally well for wayfinding during a packed match and for daily navigation through a neighborhood cultural precinct.

Three Lives in Axonometric

Axonometric site drawing showing stadium complex and surrounding structures within context of existing streets
Axonometric site drawing showing stadium complex and surrounding structures within context of existing streets
Axonometric site drawing showing cultural center buildings with yellow crane elements and open plaza
Axonometric site drawing showing cultural center buildings with yellow crane elements and open plaza

The axonometric drawings place the project within its surrounding street grid, making the scale and integration legible. The first axon shows the complex in its stadium configuration: a dense, event-ready mass that fills its urban block. The second strips back to the cultural center phase, where yellow crane elements suggest an architecture comfortable with its own ongoing construction and deconstruction. The open plaza at the center reappears, larger now, breathing.

Reading these two drawings together is the clearest articulation of the project's thesis. The same plot of land holds radically different programs across time, not through demolition and reconstruction, but through a planned sequence of removal and reinterpretation. The concrete slabs that remain as the final park phase are not ruins. They are designed artifacts, intentional traces of a building that always knew it was going to become something else.

Why This Project Matters

The global track record of mega-event infrastructure is grim: billions spent on venues that decay into underused shells within years. Brütsch and Durrer confront this reality head-on by proposing a building whose value increases as its original program fades. The stadium phase draws international attention and revenue; the cultural center phase serves daily community life; the park phase contributes ecological and social value for generations. Each transition is not a loss but a gain.

At a moment when sustainability in architecture is too often reduced to material certifications and energy calculations, this project reminds us that the most sustainable building might be the one that plans for its own transformation. By embedding adaptability into the structural DNA of the design rather than treating it as an afterthought, the project offers a compelling and replicable model for how cities can host the world without mortgaging their future.



View the Full Project

About the Designers

Designers: Dinah Brütsch, Simone Durrer

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

uni.xyz runs architecture and design competitions year-round that reward proposals with spatial conviction and real site intelligence.

Project credits: Stadium - Cultural Center - Park by Dinah Brütsch, Simone Durrer Staydium 2020 (uni.xyz).

UNI

UNI

Official UNI Account

Share your ideas with the world

Share your ideas with the world

Write about your design process, research, or opinions. Your voice matters in the architecture community.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Similar Reads

You might also enjoy these articles

publishedStory1 day ago
1+1>2 Architects Build a School from 900 Blocks of Hmong Stone on Vietnam's Rocky Plateau
publishedStory2 days ago
100A Associates Builds a Volcanic Stone Retreat on Jeju Island Rooted in Ritual and Restraint
publishedStory3 days ago
MARBÄ Artquitectura Carves a Green Courtyard into a Dense Barcelona Ground Floor
publishedStory3 days ago
Steimle Architekten Carves a Monolithic Fire Station from Red Concrete in Germersheim

Explore Sports Architecture Competitions

Discover active competitions in this discipline

UNI
Search in