BETWEEN: Modular Housing as an Ecological Corridor at the City's EdgeBETWEEN: Modular Housing as an Ecological Corridor at the City's Edge

BETWEEN: Modular Housing as an Ecological Corridor at the City's Edge

UNI
UNI published Results under Residential Building, Conceptual Architecture on

What if the edge of a city wasn't a wall but a membrane? BETWEEN takes the blunt boundary between urban density and open landscape and replows it into a gradient: a series of modular housing volumes, service cores, and sunken courtyards that allow people and nature to filter through one another. The result is not a building so much as an ecological corridor, a place where architecture operates as connective tissue rather than barrier.

Designed by Altunay Ejdar and Sude Özselçuk, BETWEEN was shortlisted in the Live Green competition. The project's site sits at a transition zone between dense urbanization on one side and open natural landscape on the other. Rather than treating this edge as a line of division, the designers read it as a living threshold, a space capable of facilitating exchange and balance between two opposing conditions.

Orange Volumes Stacked Along a Porous Street

Axonometric rendering of orange modular volumes stacked along a street with pedestrians and evergreen trees
Axonometric rendering of orange modular volumes stacked along a street with pedestrians and evergreen trees
Corner perspective rendering showing orange and white volumes clustered around a green courtyard with figures
Corner perspective rendering showing orange and white volumes clustered around a green courtyard with figures

The axonometric view reveals the project's spatial logic immediately: warm orange modular volumes stack and step along a pedestrian street, framed by evergreen trees that carry the surrounding landscape directly into the architectural fabric. These modules are not uniform blocks. They shift, rotate, and cluster around open courtyards, creating pockets of green space at ground level that pull nature through the section of the building. The corner perspective reinforces this reading: white and orange volumes gather around a central courtyard where figures move freely between interior and exterior, suggesting a social life that refuses to be contained by walls.

The modular system is designed with adaptability at its core. Individual units can accommodate varying needs, from solo living to group configurations, ensuring both flexibility and inclusivity. Service cores containing stairs, elevators, and utilities form the structural backbone, linking vertical and horizontal movement and organizing the overall composition into legible clusters rather than a monolithic mass.

Sunken Courtyards and Tiered Circulation

Interior courtyard rendering with white paved surface and silhouetted figures moving between tiered levels
Interior courtyard rendering with white paved surface and silhouetted figures moving between tiered levels
Sectional perspective showing orange stacked volumes connected by white walkways and a linear pedestrian path
Sectional perspective showing orange stacked volumes connected by white walkways and a linear pedestrian path

The interior courtyard rendering shows a quieter register of the project. White paved surfaces drop below grade, and silhouetted figures navigate between tiered levels connected by gentle ramps and walkways. The spatial sequence here is deliberate: users move through gradients of openness and enclosure, shifting between communal gathering areas and more private zones. Each turn in the path reveals new interactions between built form and planted void.

The sectional perspective makes the structural strategy legible. Orange stacked volumes anchor the composition at intervals, while white walkways bridge between them, creating a linear pedestrian spine that stitches the entire scheme together. Semi-transparent glass units sit at key junctions, mediating light and visually connecting underground spaces to ground level. At the primary entrance, an amphitheater functions as both access point and community hub, positioning social gathering at the very moment a visitor crosses from city to threshold. This is circulation designed as narrative, not mere logistics.

Green Rooftops Extending the Landscape Upward

View across sunken white courtyards toward orange volumes with green rooftop terraces and evergreen trees
View across sunken white courtyards toward orange volumes with green rooftop terraces and evergreen trees

From across the sunken courtyards, the view toward the orange volumes reveals a final, critical layer: green rooftop terraces planted with evergreen trees that extend the surrounding natural landscape onto the building itself. These planted surfaces are not decorative afterthoughts. They contribute to microclimatic comfort, support biodiversity, and visually dissolve the top edge of the architecture into the treeline beyond. The project's structural logic allows for reconfiguration over time, making the scheme inherently resilient to urban growth and environmental change.

Open courtyards, pedestrian pathways, and recreational landscapes work together at grade to reinforce this ecological intent. The project treats its ground plane as a shared commons, blurring the ownership line between building residents and the broader public. Architecture here is not a destination to arrive at but a territory to pass through.

Why This Project Matters

Most urban edge projects choose a side: they either defend the city against nature with hard infrastructure, or they retreat into pastoral fantasy. BETWEEN refuses that binary. Its five-step design process, moving from site mapping through threshold identification to spatial blending, produces an architecture that is genuinely porous. The modular housing system, the sunken courtyards, the glass connectors, and the planted rooftops each play a distinct role in constructing a continuum rather than a boundary.

Ejdar and Özselçuk have proposed something quietly radical: that the most sustainable response to urban expansion might not be a green wall or a solar panel array, but a rethinking of where city ends and landscape begins. By designing that transition as a habitable space in its own right, BETWEEN turns edge condition into primary architecture.



View the Full Project

About the Designers

Designers: Altunay Ejdar, Sude Özselçuk

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

uni.xyz runs architecture and design competitions year-round that reward proposals with spatial conviction and real site intelligence.

Project credits: BETWEEN by Altunay Ejdar, Sude Özselçuk Live Green (uni.xyz).

UNI

UNI

Official UNI Account

Share your ideas with the world

Share your ideas with the world

Write about your design process, research, or opinions. Your voice matters in the architecture community.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Similar Reads

You might also enjoy these articles

publishedResults14 hours ago
Mechanism of Memories: Adaptive Architecture Reimagines Offshore Structures as Living Cultural Machines
publishedResults2 days ago
Wildlife Rehabilitation Architecture in Australia: A Regenerative Sanctuary for Koalas by Philip Skein and Keegan Mayber
publishedResults6 days ago
The Interfusion: Mobile Performance Architecture Reconnecting Art and Public Space
publishedResults1 week ago
Biophilic Architecture and Regenerative Stadium Design: Biophilia Lagos by Rachel George

Explore Residential Building Competitions

Discover active competitions in this discipline

UNI
Search in