3-Living: Co-Living for Three Kinds of Resident3-Living: Co-Living for Three Kinds of Resident

3-Living: Co-Living for Three Kinds of Resident

UNI
UNI published Story under Residential Building, Housing on

Three kinds of people need three kinds of rooms. 3-Living, a project by Martyna Slowinska, designs a co-living building around this observation. Travellers need short stays and flexible spaces. Workers need reliable infrastructure and quiet. Lifers need permanence and storage. The building provides all three, stacked vertically in a six-storey timber structure where the ground floor is public, the middle floors are shared, and the upper floors are private.

The project won the Hustle Hub '19 competition on uni.xyz. It is the most systematically resolved entry in the series: three user groups, three spatial strategies, one building that serves them all without compromise.

The Facade: Timber, Irregular, Alive

Night facade of the 3-Living building: six-storey timber cladding with irregularly placed windows, planted balconies, a glass ground floor with a food truck and string lights
Night facade of the 3-Living building: six-storey timber cladding with irregularly placed windows, planted balconies, a glass ground floor with a food truck and string lights

The night render establishes the building's character immediately. A six-storey timber-clad facade with irregularly placed windows of different sizes. Plants spill from balconies. String lights hang across the ground floor, where a glass-fronted retail space opens onto the street next to a food truck. A full moon hangs behind the building. The atmosphere is warm, social, and unmistakably residential.

The irregular windows are not random. They correspond to the different unit types behind them: small windows for bathrooms and kitchens, large ones for living rooms, tall narrow ones for bedrooms. The facade is a diagram of the plan, readable from the street. You can see the variety of life inside before you enter.

Three Groups, Three Stays

The project identifies three resident types by how long they stay. The Travel Group (bloggers, photographers, adventurers) stays for days or weeks. They need minimal private space and maximum access to communal areas. The Work Group (IT specialists, designers, entrepreneurs) stays for months. They need reliable wifi, quiet rooms, and co-working. The Life Group stays indefinitely. They need full apartments with kitchens, storage, and balconies.

This classification drives the plan. Short-stay units are small and clustered near shared kitchens. Medium-stay units are larger with private bathrooms. Long-stay units are full apartments. The building gets more private as you go up. The ground floor belongs to everyone. The top floor belongs to the resident who lives there longest.

The Communal Spaces: Kitchen, Terrace, Core

Communal kitchen and lounge with a terrazzo feature wall, timber ceiling structure, residents cooking at the counter, chatting at tables, and working in soft seating areas
Communal kitchen and lounge with a terrazzo feature wall, timber ceiling structure, residents cooking at the counter, chatting at tables, and working in soft seating areas
Open timber-framed terrace with string lights, djembe drums, deck chairs, potted plants, and residents relaxing on a shared outdoor balcony overlooking the neighbourhood
Open timber-framed terrace with string lights, djembe drums, deck chairs, potted plants, and residents relaxing on a shared outdoor balcony overlooking the neighbourhood

The two interior renders show the project's communal life. The kitchen and lounge has a terrazzo feature wall, a timber ceiling structure, a cooking counter, dining tables, and soft seating zones. People cook, chat, and work simultaneously. The space is not programmed for a single activity. It is sized and furnished for all of them at once.

The open terrace is the second communal highlight: a timber-framed outdoor room with string lights, djembe drums, deck chairs, and plants. It is the kind of space that co-living brochures promise and plans rarely deliver. Here it is real: a shared outdoor living room with enough furniture and atmosphere to draw people out of their private units.

The Section and the Plans

Building section showing six storeys with blue and green double-height communal voids, ground-floor parking, and the gradation from public to private spaces upward
Building section showing six storeys with blue and green double-height communal voids, ground-floor parking, and the gradation from public to private spaces upward
Four floor plans: ground floor with landscaped courtyard, parking level below, 5th floor with colour-coded apartment units, and an upper floor with a central shared living space
Four floor plans: ground floor with landscaped courtyard, parking level below, 5th floor with colour-coded apartment units, and an upper floor with a central shared living space
Six floor plans from ground to roof showing the colour-coded programme evolution: public ground, parking, residential floors with shared cores, and a rooftop solar panel grid
Six floor plans from ground to roof showing the colour-coded programme evolution: public ground, parking, residential floors with shared cores, and a rooftop solar panel grid

The section shows the building's vertical logic. Ground floor is public: retail, markets, events. Above it, parking. Then residential floors with double-height communal voids (highlighted in blue and green) that create vertical connections between levels. The voids ensure that shared spaces are not tucked into leftover corners. They are the largest rooms in the building.

The floor plans confirm the system. The ground floor has a landscaped courtyard. Upper floors ring the courtyard with apartments, colour-coded by type. The central shared space grows larger on some floors and smaller on others, depending on how many short-stay versus long-stay units surround it. The plan is flexible because the module is standardised. The variety comes from how the modules are combined.

Why This Project Won

The Hustle Hub competition asked for co-living. 3-Living won because it answered the question the brief was really asking: co-living for whom? Most entries designed one kind of shared space and hoped it would suit everyone. This entry designed three kinds of shared space, matched them to three kinds of resident, and stacked them in a building that makes the differences visible.

For anyone studying co-living typologies, the lesson is segmentation. Not all shared-living residents are the same. A traveller staying three days has different needs from an entrepreneur staying three months. A building that acknowledges this and provides for it will be more successful than one that treats all residents as identical.


View the Full Project

About the Designer

Designer: Martyna Slowinska

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

If co-living typologies, modular housing, or user-segmented residential design is the kind of work you want to explore, uni.xyz runs competitions year-round that reward systematic thinking applied to real spatial problems.

Project credits: 3-Living by Martyna Slowinska. Winner, Hustle Hub '19 (uni.xyz).

UNI

UNI

Official UNI Account

Share your ideas with the world

Share your ideas with the world

Write about your design process, research, or opinions. Your voice matters in the architecture community.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Similar Reads

You might also enjoy these articles

publishedStory3 days ago
Filtering Space: A Gradual Spatial Experience
publishedStory5 days ago
Longbranch Residence: A Forest-Integrated Contemporary Home in Key Center, Washington
publishedStory5 days ago
CIFI Sales Center Park Mansion: Harmonizing Architecture with Nature
publishedStory5 days ago
“Ottoni House Renovation: Preserving 1970s Architecture with Contemporary Design in São Paulo”

Explore Residential Building Competitions

Discover active competitions in this discipline

UNI
Search in