3-Living: Co-Living for Three Kinds of Resident
A winning co-living design that segments residents into travellers, workers, and lifers, giving each group its own spatial strategy in one building.
Three kinds of people need three kinds of rooms. 3-Living, a project by Martyna Slowinska, designs a co-living building around this observation. Travellers need short stays and flexible spaces. Workers need reliable infrastructure and quiet. Lifers need permanence and storage. The building provides all three, stacked vertically in a six-storey timber structure where the ground floor is public, the middle floors are shared, and the upper floors are private.
The project won the Hustle Hub '19 competition on uni.xyz. It is the most systematically resolved entry in the series: three user groups, three spatial strategies, one building that serves them all without compromise.
The Facade: Timber, Irregular, Alive

The night render establishes the building's character immediately. A six-storey timber-clad facade with irregularly placed windows of different sizes. Plants spill from balconies. String lights hang across the ground floor, where a glass-fronted retail space opens onto the street next to a food truck. A full moon hangs behind the building. The atmosphere is warm, social, and unmistakably residential.
The irregular windows are not random. They correspond to the different unit types behind them: small windows for bathrooms and kitchens, large ones for living rooms, tall narrow ones for bedrooms. The facade is a diagram of the plan, readable from the street. You can see the variety of life inside before you enter.
Three Groups, Three Stays
The project identifies three resident types by how long they stay. The Travel Group (bloggers, photographers, adventurers) stays for days or weeks. They need minimal private space and maximum access to communal areas. The Work Group (IT specialists, designers, entrepreneurs) stays for months. They need reliable wifi, quiet rooms, and co-working. The Life Group stays indefinitely. They need full apartments with kitchens, storage, and balconies.
This classification drives the plan. Short-stay units are small and clustered near shared kitchens. Medium-stay units are larger with private bathrooms. Long-stay units are full apartments. The building gets more private as you go up. The ground floor belongs to everyone. The top floor belongs to the resident who lives there longest.
The Communal Spaces: Kitchen, Terrace, Core


The two interior renders show the project's communal life. The kitchen and lounge has a terrazzo feature wall, a timber ceiling structure, a cooking counter, dining tables, and soft seating zones. People cook, chat, and work simultaneously. The space is not programmed for a single activity. It is sized and furnished for all of them at once.
The open terrace is the second communal highlight: a timber-framed outdoor room with string lights, djembe drums, deck chairs, and plants. It is the kind of space that co-living brochures promise and plans rarely deliver. Here it is real: a shared outdoor living room with enough furniture and atmosphere to draw people out of their private units.
The Section and the Plans



The section shows the building's vertical logic. Ground floor is public: retail, markets, events. Above it, parking. Then residential floors with double-height communal voids (highlighted in blue and green) that create vertical connections between levels. The voids ensure that shared spaces are not tucked into leftover corners. They are the largest rooms in the building.
The floor plans confirm the system. The ground floor has a landscaped courtyard. Upper floors ring the courtyard with apartments, colour-coded by type. The central shared space grows larger on some floors and smaller on others, depending on how many short-stay versus long-stay units surround it. The plan is flexible because the module is standardised. The variety comes from how the modules are combined.
Why This Project Won
The Hustle Hub competition asked for co-living. 3-Living won because it answered the question the brief was really asking: co-living for whom? Most entries designed one kind of shared space and hoped it would suit everyone. This entry designed three kinds of shared space, matched them to three kinds of resident, and stacked them in a building that makes the differences visible.
For anyone studying co-living typologies, the lesson is segmentation. Not all shared-living residents are the same. A traveller staying three days has different needs from an entrepreneur staying three months. A building that acknowledges this and provides for it will be more successful than one that treats all residents as identical.
View the Full Project
About the Designer
Designer: Martyna Slowinska
Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz
If co-living typologies, modular housing, or user-segmented residential design is the kind of work you want to explore, uni.xyz runs competitions year-round that reward systematic thinking applied to real spatial problems.
Project credits: 3-Living by Martyna Slowinska. Winner, Hustle Hub '19 (uni.xyz).
Popular Articles
Popular articles from the community
Rojkind Arquitectos and Think Parametric Build a Glueless Pavilion from 67 Interlocking Panels
A serpentine fiber-cement installation in Chapultepec Park celebrates a decade of architectural media in Mexico City.
Takeshi Hosaka Architects Suspends a Concrete Cross Above a Yokohama Cemetery
A 28-square-meter burial renovation in Yokohama lifts the symbol of resurrection into the sky so mourners see it against heaven.
HCCH Studio Wraps a Shanghai High-Rise Office in Curved Walls of Translucent Glass
A 1,000 square meter fit-out in Lujiazui replaces the typical tech-office palette with layered glass, micro-cement, and quiet rigor.
Bernardes Arquitetura Stretches a Timber Roof Along a Reservoir's Edge in Minas Gerais
Dam House in Itaúna lets a sweeping wooden canopy dissolve the boundary between hillside terrain and open water.
Similar Reads
You might also enjoy these articles
317studio Turns an 87 m² Classroom into a Forest Clearing for Scouts in New Taipei City
A rope canopy, student-made specimens, and campfire geometry replace rows of desks in this Scouting classroom in Xizhi District.
24 7 Arquitetura Builds a Timber Pavilion as a Family's First Act on a 5,000 m² Brazilian Plot
In Jaguariúna, a prefabricated glulam house nestles among mature trees as the opening move of a larger residential masterplan.
1+1>2 Architects Build a School from 900 Blocks of Hmong Stone on Vietnam's Rocky Plateau
On a barren valley in Ha Giang province, a community quarried its own stone to raise a kindergarten and primary school rooted in Hmong identity.
100A Associates Builds a Volcanic Stone Retreat on Jeju Island Rooted in Ritual and Restraint
Watarstay [Wa:Tar] in Bongseong-ri channels Jeju's basalt, reed, and hemp into a 150 m² hospitality space shaped by contemplation.
Explore Residential Building Competitions
Discover active competitions in this discipline
The Global Benchmark for Architecture Dissertation Awards
Challenge to design mud housing for contemporary communities
Comments (0)
Please login or sign up to add comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!