01 | Prison: Rethinking Incarceration Through Biophilic and Modular Architecture01 | Prison: Rethinking Incarceration Through Biophilic and Modular Architecture

01 | Prison: Rethinking Incarceration Through Biophilic and Modular Architecture

UNI
UNI published Story under Research, Infrastructure Design on

Cybercrime thrives on anonymity, yet traditional prisons strip identity from the people inside them. That paradox sits at the center of 01 | Prison, a project that refuses to accept the inherited logic of punitive architecture. Instead of reinforcing isolation, the design deploys biophilic materials, modular spatial organization, and community-oriented programming to construct a facility where rehabilitation is not an afterthought but the organizing principle.

Designed by Fabian Gay and Thibaut Servier, this entry to the Switching Prisons competition won the People's Choice Award for its adaptive approach to prison architecture. The project asks a pointed question: as the nature of crime shifts toward the digital realm, how should the physical spaces of incarceration evolve? The answer here is a building that foregrounds timber construction, natural light, and shared social spaces over concrete walls and surveillance corridors.

Deep Recessed Openings and a Landscape That Participates

Composite showing elevation, plan, and rendered facade with deep recessed openings framed by trees
Composite showing elevation, plan, and rendered facade with deep recessed openings framed by trees

The composite of elevation, plan, and rendered facade reveals a building that mediates between enclosure and openness with striking precision. Deep recessed openings punctuate the facade, creating thresholds between interior life and the surrounding tree canopy. These are not token gestures toward nature; the trees are positioned to frame views, filter light, and psychologically soften the boundary condition of the institution. The plan layout suggests a modular logic, with repeatable units that could adapt to different population sizes or security classifications without requiring wholesale redesign.

Timber Corridors and a Multi-Story Atrium as Social Infrastructure

Section drawings alongside rendered views of timber-lined corridor and multi-story atrium with figure
Section drawings alongside rendered views of timber-lined corridor and multi-story atrium with figure
Section drawing and elevation showing timber-clad facade with vertical banding and balcony railings
Section drawing and elevation showing timber-clad facade with vertical banding and balcony railings

The sectional drawings and rendered views expose the project's interior ambition. A timber-lined corridor runs through the building, warm in tone and tactile in materiality, a deliberate contrast to the steel and concrete that define most carceral environments. The multi-story atrium, shown with a solitary figure for scale, functions as the social heart of the facility. Vertical circulation and visual connections across floors transform what would typically be dead space into an active commons where inmates encounter one another in structured, non-threatening ways.

The second set of section and elevation drawings reinforces the commitment to timber as both structure and surface. Vertical banding on the facade introduces rhythm and texture, while balcony railings suggest that outdoor access is distributed across multiple levels rather than confined to a single exercise yard. This is security architecture that does not look like security architecture, and that distinction matters. The psychological effect of material choice on behavior is well documented; wood reads as domestic, not institutional, and that reading can shift how people inhabit a space.

A Dining Hall Built Around Encounter, Not Control

Floor plans above perspective view of timber-columned dining hall with figures and scattered tables
Floor plans above perspective view of timber-columned dining hall with figures and scattered tables

The floor plans above a perspective view of the dining hall complete the programmatic picture. Timber columns rise through the space, supporting a generous ceiling height that gives the room a civic quality rather than a cafeteria one. Scattered tables replace rigid rows, encouraging smaller group interactions and allowing individuals some agency over where and with whom they sit. Figures populate the space casually, and the rendering deliberately avoids the regimented geometry that typifies institutional dining. This is community-oriented space at its most legible: architecture that trusts its occupants enough to offer choice.

Why This Project Matters

01 | Prison does not propose a utopia. It proposes a recalibration. By addressing cybercrime, a category of offense that barely existed a generation ago, Gay and Servier force a broader conversation about whether inherited prison typologies serve anyone well. Their answer is grounded in specifics: timber structure for warmth and sustainability, modular planning for adaptability, biophilic design for psychological well-being, and communal programming for social reintegration. Each decision is legible in the drawings.

The People's Choice Award signals that this resonated beyond the jury. Voters recognized something in the project's refusal to accept that security and dignity are opposed values. As incarceration rates climb globally and recidivism remains stubbornly high, work like this argues that architecture is not a passive container for punishment but an active participant in rehabilitation. That argument, made this clearly and this specifically, is worth taking seriously.



View the Full Project

About the Designers

Designers: Fabian Gay, Thibaut Servier

Enter a Design Competition on uni.xyz

uni.xyz runs architecture and design competitions year-round that reward proposals with spatial conviction and real site intelligence.

Project credits: 01 | Prison by Fabian Gay, Thibaut Servier Switching Prisons (uni.xyz).

UNI

UNI

Official UNI Account

Share your ideas with the world

Share your ideas with the world

Write about your design process, research, or opinions. Your voice matters in the architecture community.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Similar Reads

You might also enjoy these articles

publishedStory6 days ago
sprout - line | collective flourishing
publishedStory6 days ago
HARLEM USTOPIA
publishedStory6 days ago
MOTION
publishedStory6 days ago
Home On A Leaf

Explore Research Competitions

Discover active competitions in this discipline

UNI
Search in